The Greatest Novels of All Time! (In my opinion)

1. Frankenstein by Mary Shelley
2. To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf
3. The Three Musketeers by Alexandre Dumas
4.Watchmen by Alan Moore
5. Inkdeath by Cornelia Funke

First off, a disclaimer. I included graphic novels in consideration for my all time favorite novels. They include chapters, a long story complete with story arcs and character arcs, and can be rich in meaning and subtext.

 

Second, this was difficult, particularly figuring out the final book in the five. It always seems that way for me in top 5 or top 10 lists.

 These novels all have decently sized casts of characters that feature in their stories. I think that is something I generally appreciate about stories - when authors create more than one character that is three dimensional and well rounded. Watchmen and the Three Musketeers share in a sort of serialized nature: they can (and in the case of The Three Musketeers probably were) be read as a bunch of individual installments and still hold together. Case in point: I actually read The Three Musketeers over the course of two years - not because it was bad, I loved it! - but because of the combination of its easy to put down/pick back up serialized nature and also the heap of books I had to read in high school AP English classes.

 I also liked that the novels featured characters with realistic internal struggles. In Frankenstein, the Creature wants love and companionship. In To the Lighthouse, James Ramsay despises his father yet at the same time desires his approval. Rorschach is still haunted and broken by the murder of the young girl he investigated years earlier.




The worlds all share in their intrigue - even for classical settings. Frankenstein is set in these dark and dreary locations where you either fear for the imminent arrival of the Creature in the present or marvel at the fantasy-like little cottage where the French family lives that the Creature so desperately wants to be a part of. In To the Lighthouse, the Ramsay's summer home in Scotland is so 'normal' - but this adds to the striking realism of the characters and the piece as a whole. Also, the lighthouse, what James so much wants to go to, is a far-off fantasy for much of a novel. The Three Musketeers is set in a France where the King and Cardinal are at such odds and had so many sort of spies and secrets that it felt at times like a sort of spy setting while still retaining its classical qualities. The gritty world of Watchmen, brought to life by both the images and the text, features vigilante superheroes who are just normal people in costumes, and with plenty of insecurities and doubts. Lastly, the world of Inkdeath is inside the book written by one of its main characters - a fantasy world where new elements can be written and spoken into existence.



I think I've surprised myself with this list in that three of the five novels were written many years ago (to say the least). I do enjoy the Harry Potters, Huger Games, Redwalls, Inheritance Cycles of the world, but I suppose for a best of all time list my tastes are a bit stricter. 

Professionalizing Yourself

This course will introduce you to the ways in which social media will become a part of your professional writing life. Consider this to be the moment you begin your transition from using social media for play and personal use to a more professional approach. 

Remember, a lot of people read this blog. 

Well, maybe not thousands. But hundreds. Definitely hundreds. 

Please create a Google profile. Consider what email address you use to sign up for Blogger, twitter, etc.  Maybe it's time to graduate from luvucolts at gmail to your actual name. Consider the photograph you use. 

I want to show you guys how writers use social media as professionals trying to connect to other writers and potential readers, and I want to observe how skilled you are at this b/c I’m recruiting “Social Media Tutors” for the 2013 Midwest Writers Workshop. 

If you have a blog of your own, great!  Consider blogging weekly or bi-weekly about the course and your progress on your novel. If you don’t have a blog, consider starting one. 

Response #9: Jacket Copy

THIS WEEK, YOUR RESPONSE WILL BE DONE ON THE PRIVATE BLOG.

http://novelwritingspring12.blogspot.com/

Thank you!

Cathy

Response #8: Genre Fiction in Creative Writing Classes

I'm sorry that this posted a few days early. This blog post is for NEXT WEEK, APRIL 9-12.
The response for TODAY (APRIL 2 OR 3) is on the partial. THIS ONE.

First, read this blog post by a former student of mine, Sal Pane, who is also a teacher of creative writing.

Then, consider the following questions and statements:

• The books we find and read as young people are generally commercial fiction, genre fiction. The only place to buy books in my hometown was at the grocery store, for example. I wasn't exposed to literary fiction much. I wrote about this here. I find it interesting that what probably brought you to the creative writing classroom is your love of genre fiction. And the first thing you learn is that the kind of book that brought you to us isn't acceptable in the classroom. Or most classrooms. 

• You need to know this: if you want to get an MFA, you will have a very difficult time getting in if your writing sample is genre fiction. This is because most of the faculty (not all) who teach in writing programs don't write genre fiction. And remember, decisions about who gets in are made by a committee comprised of writing faculty, and the number one criteria is the writing sample. You don't just apply to an MFA program like you do to college. For example, the most competitive programs might receive 500-1000 applications for 8 spots. This isn't a bias being expressed by individual writing faculty. The governing body of this discipline, AWP, clearly says that the standard in creative writing programs is "work of publishable LITERARY quality." So: what I'm saying is that if your novel for this class is pretty much straight genre, and you want to pursue an MFA, you will have trouble getting in to most programs if you use this book as your writing sample. You can piss and moan about this, but it won't do much good. You have to decide: if you want to pursue a graduate education AND you want to be a genre writer, start thinking hard about this issue. Do you need an MFA in order to write the kind of book you want to write? Are you willing to write a different kind of book in order to get in and to graduate? 

• What, other than marketing, is the difference between genre fiction and literary fiction? What genre fiction do you consider to be "LITERARY" and what genre fiction do you find not literary?  

Your 500-750-word response must refer to the Sal Pane post to demonstrate that you read it.

Response #7: The Partial

Due before class April 2 (Monday class) or April 3 (T/R class)

Read this previous blog post about what a partial is.

By this Friday at 5 PM, you must have a fairly polished 25-50 page partial to give to your small group. This must be the opening to your book (unless we have made a different arrangement).

The partial should be formatted and presented as you would present a book manuscript to an editor. Go here to see a sample. This means it must be proofread, double spaced, have page numbers, a title, table of contents (if necessary), and any relevant front matter (such as a map or family tree).

This draft of your partial will be read by your small group and by me. You'll think about all the things we say and then go back in and revise the partial one more time for the final.

So, it's okay if the draft you distribute on April 6th isn't "done," but it should be "done enough" that someone can read it. It will be okay for you to include provisional scenes, thumbnail sketches of scenes ("Here there's going to be scene between the protagonist and her mother in an ice cream shop where they talk about birthcontrol while eating banana splits), and questions, ("I'm not sure if these statistics are accurate but will check on this later").

The typical workshop would get grumpy and complain about an incomplete story. But remember: YOUR SMALL GROUP IS NOT A WORKSHOP. IT'S A WRITING GROUP. It's intended to be supportive.

Read this to understand why a small group discussion of a novel in progress is different from a large group, all class workshop of a stand alone short story.

You will email it to the members of your group AND TO ME at cathydayteacher@gmail.com, and to Sarah Grubb at sarahrg23@gmail.com.

What group are you in?

Monday class

Tuesday/Thursday class

Warning: If you do not email me your partial by 5 PM on Friday April 6, I am under no obligation to read your partial, and you lose the opportunity to have a personal, one-on-one conference with me. You will also lose 50 points each day it's late to your group.

Remember, you also need to produce 2,250 NEW WORDS by April 6 for your weekly words.

Welcome to the wacky world of writing a novel.

Your topic for this week's response: generate 5-10 questions you want the people in your small group to answer about your partial. What kind of feedback are you looking for? How close are you to having your partial  ready for your group, and for me? What are your biggest worries? What do you feel confident about? How do you feel about sharing your partial when you are still in the process of writing the novel? (500-750 words)

Response #6: Endings

Due March 26 or 27.

By ending, I don't mean the last few pages, the denouement. By ending, I mean THE KNOCKOUT. The PAYOFF. The BIG MOMENT YOU'VE ALL BEEN WAITING FOR.

Qualities of a Satisfactory Novel Ending

• The ending seems both inevitable and surprising at the same time. It doesn't "come out of nowhere." It isn't predictable. 

• The ending is the result of the character's actions. The ending is not the result of something happening to the character, but rather the result of a deliberate choice.

• The ending must actually end. Something finalizes, concludes, gets tied off. Even if the story will go on as a series, there still needs to be some sort of provisional ending. 

• Something changes. Otherwise, your novel is just a bunch of scenes strung together. 

• The ending is sufficiently complex and brings together a number of layers--consider for example the end of The Sweet Hereafter. Nicole's choice effectively concludes ALL the subplots of the book. 

• The ending "matters," meaning that there was something at stake and now, something is irrevocably changed. 

• It's emotionally or intellectually satisfying. 

Qualities of an Unsatisfactory Novel Ending

• Here's some: http://www.dancaster.com/writing08.htm

• You cheat and everything ends happily ever after.

• Or you gloss over some vital steps in order to "get to the end."

• You bail on a subplot, plot layer, and/or plot thread and leave it dangling. You leave burning questions still burning. 

• The story is too simple, not layered, and so the outcome doesn't resonate as fully for the reader, who thinks, "Eh..."

• There's only an exterior change in circumstances for the character, not an internal change. Or vice versa. 

What you need to do

Go ahead and write (or write about) what you think is the most pivotal scene, or series of connected scenes, what you imagine will be the end of your novel--remembering, of course, that this can certainly change later.

Don't put your entire ending in this response, just a paragraph or a description of what will happen. Put the actual ending in your Weekly Words due Friday. For this response, respond to having written/thought through the ending. Consider these questions: 

• Does the scene have a beginning, middle, and end? 
• What do you imagine will be the scene immediately preceding this scene? 
• What scene will immediately follow it? 
• Why is this scene the most fundamental scene of your novel? 
• Does it bring together the various plot layers and subplots of the novel? What will make it satisfying, do you think? 

Also consider these questions:

• What do you like in an ending, generally? What don't you like? What--to you--constitutes a satisfactory ending or "pay off"? 
• What are some of your favorite (and least favorite) endings and what made them good (or bad)? What can you learn from them? 
• How do you feel about having thought through the ending? Does this feel wrong? Does this feel good? Some say you should never know the end, because this takes all the surprise out of writing. Others say it's impossible to write a novel and NOT know the end. What's your opinion?

Remember that your response must be about 500-750 words.

Response 5: Language

Due  before class March 19, MONDAY CLASS, or before class March 20 (TR CLASS)


The topic this week is Language. 


I started this semester by saying "Think scene, not sentence." In this class, I focus on macro issues, because I think that most creative writing classes focus on the micro over the macro. But this week, we get to talk about sentences. About language.


First, read this article on the way in which The Great Gatsby was re-written for younger readers.


Here's the original passage from Gatsby: 


We walked through a high hallway into a bright rosy-colored space, fragilely bound into the house by French windows at either end. The windows were ajar and gleaming white against the fresh grass outside that seemed to grow a little way into the house. A breeze blew through the room, blew curtains in at one end and out the other like pale flags, twisting them up toward the frosted wedding-cake of the ceiling, and then rippled over the wine-colored rug, making a shadow on it as wind does on the sea.

The only completely stationary object in the room was an enormous couch on which two young women were buoyed up as though upon an anchored balloon. They were both in white, and their dresses were rippling and fluttering as if they had just been blown back in after a short flight around the house. I must have stood for a few moments listening to the whip and snap of the curtains and the groan of a picture on the wall. Then there was a boom as Tom Buchanan shut the rear windows and the caught wind died out about the room, and the curtains and the rugs and the two young women ballooned slowly to the floor.

In the rewrite, the editors turned those two paragraphs into this: Wind blew through the room until Tom closed the window.


Your assignment for this week is this to answer these four questions:


1.) How do you feel about this rewriting of Gatsby? Is the original excessively flowery and the revision better? Or do you feel differently? How do you feel about sentences, about language, as a fiction writer? To what degree does language matter to you? Do you prefer books that are lyrically challenging or not? How concerned are you as a writer with sentence-level beauty and clarity? Has this class and its focus on scene over sentence, on quantity over quality been easy for you or difficult? (250-750 words)


2.) Of all the books we've read so far (Connell, Henley, Perrotta, Bakopoulos, and Horrocks) how would you rank them if the criteria was "attention to language"? Most attentive to least attentive. 


3.) In each of the four Horrocks' stories, select one sentence that you find striking, beautiful, unique, etc. The BEST sentence in the story. Then rewrite it badly or too simply or awkwardly, etc. What is good about each of those sentences? Change it. Remove it. (So four sentences and four rewritings of those sentences.)


4.) What's one question you want to ask Horrocks when she visits our class next week? You can also read this great interview with her to learn more about her! She says she's working on a novel about Erik Satie. He composed this song, which you have heard, although you may not realize it. 

Enjoy In Print! https://www.facebook.com/events/157353087718886/